Dissent or Disrupt
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
To Dissent or not to Dissent? Informative Dissent and Parliamentary Governance
Legislative dissent occurs frequently in most parliamentary systems despite its potential detrimental effects on both party and legislator, i.e., legislators depend on their party label for re-election, whose value in turn depends in part on the party’s ability to appear cohesive. Commonly dissent has been attributed to ‘extreme’ preferences. I provide an informational rationale for dissent. Di...
متن کاملVoluntary contributions by consent or dissent
We study games where voluntary contributions can be adjusted until a steady state is found. In consent games contributions start at zero and can be increased by consent, and in dissent games contributions start high and can be decreased by dissent. Equilibrium analysis predicts free riding in consent games but, in contrast, as much as socially efficient outcomes in dissent games. In our experim...
متن کاملThe Dissent over Dissent Over Descent
This paper is made available online in accordance with publisher policies. Please scroll down to view the document itself. Please refer to the repository record for this item and our policy information available from the repository home page for further information. To see the final version of this paper please visit the publisher’s website. Access to the published version may require a subscri...
متن کاملInstitutionalists: A United Front or Divergent Voices of Dissent?
One third of a century ago, Paul Samuelson [1959, 1629] argued that American economists "present a united front tbat reflects too little basic disagreement on fundamentals." Samuelson's point was confirmed in a 1976 survey of economists by J. R. Kearl et al. [1979; hereafter "Kearl"]. Kearl concluded that, among economists, there was much agreement and very little disagreement on both theoretic...
متن کاملDeference or Dissent? Congress Responds to U.S. v. Eichman
Since Marbury v. Madison (1803) 1 , the role of the Supreme Court as the final arbiter of the meaning of the U.S. Constitution has been largely accepted by both mass and elite publics. However, on occasion those interpretations have been the subject of heated dispute, often with the states, the executive, or the legislative branch. The Court's 5–4 decision in Texas v. Johnson (1989) 2 raised su...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Science
سال: 1968
ISSN: 0036-8075,1095-9203
DOI: 10.1126/science.160.3830.841